Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gabriel Decamps vs Marino Jakic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Decamps vs Jakic analysis and find out who is favored!
Gabriel Decamps vs Marino Jakic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Decamps 1 - 0 Jakic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Decamps has won 48.76% of points on their second serve, while Jakic has won 45.22%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Decamps, in recent form, has won 56.67% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jakic has won 46.85%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.23% and 37.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Decamps has saved 55.42% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jakic has saved 60.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Decamps has won 62.71% of matches played (W/L 37/ 22), with Jakic winning 61.54% (W/L 16/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Decamps has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 83/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12). Jakic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 23/ 16), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Decamps has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.09% of matches (W/L 32/ 15), where as Jakic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64% of matches (W/L 16/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Decamps winning 1 times and Jakic being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Decamps winning 2 and Jakic winning 1. The last match between Decamps and Jakic was at the M15 Bol, 22-05-2024, First, Clay with Gabriel Decamps getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Decamps and Jakic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Decamps winning 1 times and Jakic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Decamps winning 0, and Jakic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Decamps has played against opponents with an average rank of 188.8 while Jakic has played against players with an average rank of 76.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Decamps has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jakic has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Decamps has converted 46.93% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jakic has converted 50.53% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
623
Rank
262
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
63% (164-96)
Career Total W/L
59% (24-17)
66% (21-11)
YTD W/L
64% (16-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Gabriel Decamps vs Marino Jakic For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Decamps VS Jakic
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Gabriel Decamps | Marino Jakic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:0 | 2:3:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (48/85) | 61% (43/71) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (33/48) | 60% (26/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (21/37) | 43% (12/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 20% (2/10) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (33/71) | 36% (31/85) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Marino Jakic
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gabriel Decamps | Marino Jakic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (21/11) | 64% (16/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (45/24) | 59% (35/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (356/271) | 54% (311/263) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 74% (14/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 64% (16/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 65 | 60 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 105 | 44 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:28 | 1:2:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 162.5 | 79.08 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1092/1777) | 56% (633/1135) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (746/1092) | 68% (433/633) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (334/685) | 45% (227/502) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (107/228) | 51% (48/95) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (842/1897) | 41% (418/1031) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 68% (19/9) | 67% (16/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (20/29) | 64% (16/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 67% (6/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (18/18) | 86% (14/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (18/0) | 14% (14/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 36% (11/4) |
Gabriel Decamps Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Pieczonka
Player
Gabriel Decamps
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve %
23%
(
3 of
13)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
13
Total Points Won
4
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Gabriel Decamps
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Jonas Trinker
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Marino Jakic
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Gabriel Decamps
52%
(
53 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Gabriel Decamps
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Alejandro Bancalari
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Antonio Nunez
Player
Gabriel Decamps
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Felipe Pagnacco
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Marino Jakic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Matuszewski
Player
Marino Jakic
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Eriksson
Player
Marino Jakic
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
53%
(
52 of
99)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
99)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marino Jakic
Player
Facundo Bermejo
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marino Jakic
Player
Gregorio Biondolillo
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Marino Jakic
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marino Jakic
Player
Karlo Cubelic
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
51
|
2-6 6-2 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marino Jakic
Player
Noah Thurner
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
75%
(
64 of
85)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(6) 6-4 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jerko Brkic
Player
Marino Jakic
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Decamps Vs Jakic Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Decamps are available here and Jakic photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
